Some of the funds whose days would appear to be numbered:
- all of the former Claymore, now iShares, Advantaged ETFs that Canadian Couch Potato listed and described here.
- various Horizons ETFs like the Horizons S&P/TSX 60™ Index ETF ( symbol: HXT), which I will need to remove as the Canadian equity component from my cap-weight portfolio contest at the bottom of this page, and the Horizons S&P 500® Index (C$ Hedged) ETF (HXS)
... addendum
Horizons has put out a press release saying its fund HXT will NOT be affected by the tax change. The press release does not mention HXS but it works the same way as HXT as a total return swap. The budget document itself on page 353 of the pdf refers to transactions that change ordinary income into capital gains which HXT as an equity fund does not primarily do, so maybe HXT and HXS will escape. We'll have to keep monitoring to see exactly how this pans out.
... addendum 2
BlackRock says in a press release that the rule change will affect several of its funds - CAB, CVD, CHB, CHB.U, CYH, CBR, CMF and CMF.A
4 comments:
The press release suggests HXT will not be affected because it has never made a distribution and doesn't expect to. Should it make a distribution, however, then perhaps it will be as income/dividends?
TE, I'm not sure anyone can be certain of the outcome. The budget speech is not the law/regulation so maybe the feds will be sure to include HXT, maybe they will let it escape. When you make the rules, you can make the results come out as you wish.
I looked up your post after reading the press releases from iShares and Horizons. It appears that Horizons expects HXT not be affected by the Budget measure because (a) its derivative contracts are of the swap variety and (b) it does not distribute income.
Still, I think that tax changes should be considered a risk in holding HXT.
CC, The thing that gets me is that the budget also says the funds it is after could already be pursued under existing law and the new action merely makes it easier. Perahps the biggest protection for HXT is that it merely transforms what is mainly dividend income into capital gains, which in some tax brackets is taxed less and in others more. So maybe the CRA would not think there is enough tax to gain to be worth roping in HXT, though the indefinite deferral of paying tax is another tax leakage. HXT's implicit automatic costless reinvestment is certainly worthwhile as evidenced by its outperformance in 2012 of its physical iShares counterpart XIU by 8.1% vs 7.8%
Post a Comment