But the MER doesn't include all costs as the Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC, the mutual fund industry trade body in Canada) explains in this FAQ on fees. Some of those costs can substantial, further reducing returns to an investor.
Notable excluded costs are:
- brokerage commissions for trading; with turnover in funds up to 80% in a year, that can add up and reduce the performance of the fund (See The True Cost of Funds on Fundscope)
- sales charges, either front-load or deferred/back-end; actual performance for the investor is reduced to the extent that these charges apply - the front-load negative impact is obvious but it has been found that the deferred charges usually come into play since typical mutual fund investors apparently have short holding periods, averaging perhaps 3 years, while charges apply typically for six years.
- miscellaneous other charges, that may or may not be levied, such as RRSP admin fees, account opening fees, transfer out fees, short-term trading fees.
- trading impact costs aka the buy-sell spread, an opportunity cost, explained in The Hidden Costs of Mutual Funds by Milestone Investment Counsel
Nor are brokerage fees included in US published MERs, which are often called simply Expense Ratios. However, Total Expense Ratio does include include it - See this description of Total Expense Ratio in the Investopedia. In the UK TER also includes brokerage commissions and the information is usually published. Out with MER, bring on TER.
3 comments:
One item you missed is the cost of currency hedging. I understand this cost is also not reflected in the MER. Do you have any idea what the cost is as a percentage of NAV? BTW great blog.
Good point. Very relevant for XSP and XIN for instance. Will dig up some info in a few days after getting back from walking in the Lake District.
The short answer to your question about the cost of currency hedging is somewhere between 0.2% and 1% per year. Some funds which only have one currency to hedge against, like XSP and the US$, the iShares S&P 500 tracking fund, would be at the lower end of the scale, while one like XIN, which tracks the MSCI EAFE index and has to deal with euros, sterling, yen etc, is at the higher end. It seems that the number for any particular fund is not broken out by the fund companies and is mainly reflected in the tracking error of the fund vs the index (i.e. the amount by which the return of the fund differes from its traget index). The difficulty is that tracking error also reflects a number of other factors together with hedging costs - e.g. cash drag, timing of investments, slight differences of holdings with the the index, foreign witholding taxes, changes to the underlying indices, rounding of share prices, even if it is the largest component of tracking error.
There are two threads on the Financial Webring that I would recommend reading for more details.
1) http://www.financialwebring.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=104262&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=
2) http://www.financialwebring.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=104964&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=25&sid=9fc9e6ceeafefee6c6f242c645420721
Post a Comment