Thursday, 22 March 2007

Adjusted Cost Base for ETFs and Mutual Funds

I'm doing my taxes these days and part of that is to report the gain on some iShares Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that I sold in 2006. There's a tricky bit involved in that process which I figure is worth noting in case anyone might end up paying tax twice on their gains. Though mutual funds and ETFs are substantially similar in that they pass through capital gains and income to unit owners, there is a particular and important difference when it comes to the reinvestment of distributions. In mutual funds, the reinvestments show up as additional units and a higher adjusted cost base (ACB) for those units but with ETFs they do not. You must keep track yourself of the reinvestments and the higher ACB for ETFs. Otherwise, if you just take your original purchase cost for the ETF as the ACB, you will end paying tax again on the reinvested distribution that you already pay each year when taking figures from the T slips. I know my discount broker BMO Investorline does not keep track of the higher ACB when it shows my cost in account listings or statements. Probably none of the discount brokers do and I'm not sure all full service brokers do. It's worth checking. The iShares website has a good FAQ on the subject with more detail and a side-by-side example of the ETF vs mutual fund method. Here is another good explanation how this works for mutual funds from McColl Turner Chartered Accountants. Update January 14, 2008: Note that a return of capital distribution reduces the cost of an ETF and it is necessary for an individual investor to subtract it to properly track ACB. The proper formula for ACB, as explained by Howard Atkinson on page 160 of his excellent book on ETFs, The New Investment Frontier III, is: ACB = (total purchases + acquisition costs + reinvested distributions - return of capital) / units purchased. The main iShares page has a link labeled iShares CDN Funds - 2006 Tax Characteristics which shows all the iShares Canadian ETFs and their reinvested distributions; for earlier year breakdowns, go into the individual fund info and look for the Distribution History link on the left hand side e.g. this page for the Energy sector XEG fund.

I have to admit that despite my general preference for ETFs, this is an advantage of mutual funds over ETFs in the calculation convenience and the avoidance of costly oversights. Over a long holding period this can be significant. Even in the short space of two years from 2004 to 2006, the iShares TSX 60 XIU that I sold increased by almost $3 per unit in ACB. I'd be paying our friends at CRA quite a bit more if I simply used the original purchase cost.

6 comments:

The Canadian Money Blogs Reviewer said...

excellent article ... one note: this is not a concern if the ETF is held inside an RRSP. Also, for the sake of rebalancing portfolios, I would argue that reinvestment with DRIPs (which is the case you address in your post) is not required since you can take your distributions and invest them somewhere else (on a small amount, the commission you pay make this inefficient though).

Outroupistache said...

Thanks for the comment, it got me thinking and a new post is the result.

Anonymous said...

" It may be of interest and use to note that a return of capital distribution reduces the cost of the ETF though it is not necessary for an individual investor to subtract it." Why can an individual investor ignor the return on capital when calculating ACB.

CanadianInvestor said...

Well, thank you anonymous, my statement needs to be revised as I now understand it to be the other way round - you DO need to subtract the return of capital (ROC) from the ACB. I had read the iShares info to mean that ROC was netted out with cap gains in the reinvested distribution but that is apparently not so. Howard Atkinson's book The New Investment Frontier III states on page 160 the correct formula. I'm changing the post accordingly.

ilanit said...

When Rlxequity considers a company for acquisition, it looks for
Riverside investment criteria : market share that is a leader in its industry; operating profit margins in excess of 10%; strong management; diversified customer base.

Snow said...

I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success.

Wikinvest Wire

Economic Calendar


 Powered by Forex Pros - The Forex Trading Portal.